This is my “open letter” to tracker staff about “invite forums” and how TPS fits into the scheme of things. I mention repeatedly that I consider TPS as a Bittorrent community of people with shared interests, and is a community which has sections for invite requests/offers, as well as direct recruitment by trackers. Nonetheless, I have resigned myself to the fact that the outside torrent world basically considers us an “invite forum.” Since many of our members, including me, initially joined TPS looking to get tracker invites, I’m not about to dispute this view.
So invariably, the topic of “invite forums” may pop up in tracker forums and IRC discussions. I see almost always, the opinion tracker staff have of “invite forums” is negative. Basically they talk about how these places are a cesspool of bad users willing to play every trick in the book to score an invite to their tracker. By “bad users” I mean the collectors, traders, cheaters, invite sellers, and banned ex-members. Some tracker rules and guidelines will specifically forbid giving out invites to their tracker on invite forums, and will threaten to ban anyone caught obtaining their membership from an invite offer or request at an invite forum.
Well let’s compare TPS with those other places. For one thing, the other places will often have the word “invite” in them (even spelled backwards). There is no question those places exist for members to request or giveaway invites, often in a reckless manner. There are some which allow trading, or encourage their members to giveaway invites in order to be able to receive them, which in my mind is the same thing as trading. They may have no or few restrictions on which tracker’s invites can be offered, and have no consideration of a tracker’s rules. It’s no wonder tracker staff despise those places. (To be Devil’s advocate I will note that am sure good members of trackers have come from those “other places” as well.)
At TPS tracker staff are welcome to join and see what goes on inside. If a tracker doesn’t want their invites offered here, the tracker goes on the “No Movement” list and there is no offering or requesting of invites from that tracker. We also try to guide our new members into becoming responsible and good members of their trackers, and those who are known to be bad users get put on the “castaway” list – banished from TPS.
Now that I’m through defending TPS, I want to give my opinion on the whole concept of private trackers and invitations. Tracker staff, whether or not invite forums exist, you can’t stop a bad user from joining. If anything, the best of the bad can find ways to join your tracker with ease and are experts in avoiding the banhammer. The paradox is, the more a tracker tries to keep bad users out, the more desirable it becomes to such a user. Increasing invite rarity or eliminating them altogether will only make the tracker more attractive to the bad user. Other measures, such as having a “secret” url will make the tracker seem more “elite,” and as I’ve written before, the users who are fixated on joining a tracker they perceive as “elite” are the ones trackers would least want in their tracker. Should a tracker convince an invite forum to follow their rules, then the rule-breaking just goes underground. I note that at TPS, the staff will not snoop in on our members’ PMs or private IRC conversations.
There is an opinion circulating in the filesharing community, that the whole concept of tightly restricting access to private trackers will lead to their downfall. The greatest example of this is the “high-definition” tracker which opened invitations to their tracker after having very few for a long time. The result was numerous offers to sell their invites popped up on the internet. Another example is the new tracker which pulls the “elite” card while still getting started (no invites on forums, secret url, fake login page). The result: they come across as pretentious and potential good users will get turned off.
Please note my opinions are solely my own and not representative of TPS. My intention is not to offend tracker staff, but to provide a contrarian opinion.
