There was some discussion at TPS and other communities about a dilemma a sysop of a tracker had when dealing with a staffer who was supported by some staff because he had a lot to offer to the tracker, but engaged in other activities which were harmful to the tracker. I just wanted to share a real-life story in which a similar dilemma occurred. I have changed the names and some minor details so that the parties involved (including myself) are not identified.
Once upon a time, there was a nursing home that was losing money to competition. The place was old and not particularly attractive. The owner “Mr. Owner,” decided to engage in a Faustian Bargain and hire an administrator, who I will call “Kara,” to make some changes to the facility and improve his income. “Kara” promised that she would greatly increase the census at the nursing home and improve Mr. Owner’s income dramatically, but she insisted that she have total control of the operations of the facility, and that no one could appeal to him if she made “difficult” decisions. Little did Mr. Owner know that Kara was a morally bankrupt woman with no conscience. She had a little deal going with a corrupt administrator of a small hospital, which had other deals with some corrupt doctors. The whole crew would try to find senior patients who were covered by Medicare, but suffered from psychiatric illnesses or dementia and had no family support. (In other words, helpless.) Often, these patients were solicited and admitted to the unethical hospital, and be given unnecessary tests and exaggerated diagnoses. They then were sent to the nursing home for “physical therapy,” where Medicare would pay for a stay of up to 100 days, as long as the paperwork could show the patients were benefiting. Needless to say, Kara encouraged the billing staff at the nursing home to fudge the paperwork to prolong the billing and payments. Mr. Owner just happened to look the other way, since the money from Medicare began to pour in.
But Kara made a few fatal mistakes. Napoleon Bonaparte once said “He (or she) who in the process of becoming a leader makes enemies is a fool and will not be a leader long.” The other saying she should have followed was the Karma concept that what she put into the Universe will return to her. (aka what comes around, goes around.) To consolidate her power, she purged many of the employees at the nursing home who opposed her, and filled the ranks with loyal cronies. She also kicked out the long-time doctors and outside vendors and replaced them with her own stable of supporters, who may have been part of her whole scheme. It was rumored that bribes and kickbacks greased her whole operation.
Well the whole thing collapsed when the disgruntled parties, who could not get through to “Mr. Owner” because he gave absolute power to Kara, decided to fight back. They sought legal action against Mr. Owner and reported him and his facility to the various Federal, State and Local Authorities. The whole scheme collapsed and Kara, pursued by various authorities, fled the state, leaving Mr. Owner, holding the proverbial bag. I understand he’s now trying to start over basically from nothing.
The lesson in all this is when in a dilemma, “do the right thing.” Karma’s a bitch.
